If We See the Decline of the Cult of Attacking Play, Let’s Appreciate Its Impact.
The Life Cycle of a Movement tends to be defined by clear stages.
1. The Big Idea
An inspiring figure or coaches introduce a new and transcendent idea that promises a solution for alienated and vulnerable people.
And so it goes. Plans are in motion to challenge the establishment down in Brisbane. Tensions are rising. Smoke is rising from the sidelines. An isolated player, vulnerable, nervous, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently in chicken blood, has stumbled from the field and is removed under a blanket towards an inconclusive loan stint in county cricket.
Do you ever miss the early days, when optimism reigned? The era of early Bazball, of Bazball without brains.
2. The Honeymoon Phase
Team architects offer a new start, hope for a future, support, success within a community united in belief in the big idea.
What did it represent back then? A team united enjoying success. Ink. Strength. Determination. Peak performance vibes. Of course, England’s players will claim they don’t use the label, amusingly as it’s denied, what did we see?
However, everyone understands what it is. It’s the batsman executing a stroke so outrageous it has to be pixelated. It’s the thrill of the captain in ultimate mode, a look that says: thoughtful warrior, rugged appearance, natural look, genuinely raw you wouldn’t be surprised to look down and notice he’s fielding on the ground bare-chested holding a fish.
It’s the opener often seen to talk in press conferences, out there looking like a cheerful animal in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we’re breaking down traditions. Certainly, the vibe, for a significant period, was only good energy.
3. Expansion Period
Development stage. Cohesion maintained through repetition of mantras. These beliefs may seem irrational as a test of “true belief”.
Does anyone else feel? The criticism, the outrage, the sense of betrayal following the initial loss feels overblown, overdone. England batted badly in Perth, as is typical there. They were torn apart defensively for a couple of hours when tactics failed, carved around by Travis Head imitating their style effectively, adjusting to the pitch, an athlete shining with a kind of light around him.
Currently, we see the pile-on, the frustration, the view of the sport as a kind of abomination. The consensus is that England don’t just need to lose, they need to lose righteously, to be scoured, flame-throwered, overwhelmed through sheer skill of the bowler’s action, the simple basics of the bowler, out there celebrating his wickets with a bashful smile as if receiving a nice new fishing rod. How will they respond?
4. External Conflict
Issues emerge due to setbacks. However, faults are ignored. It begins to thrive on hatred of the outside world.
The fact remains, approaching the upcoming game, we are at an intriguing moment in the journey of this movement. England could quite easily win overseas through aggressive play. Alternatively, failure may follow. And if they do lose it appears we really might be entering the decline.
Before that happens, a couple of points to consider on the topic. Previously, back in those heady early days, of light and heat, an piece was published labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which demonstrated because everyone knows a method to show lack of cult status is should followers react defensively denying scrutiny of the beliefs.
The developments recently are equally notable. Criticism of the approach is now the trend. Social media is furious, disappointed commentators, images of frustrated supporters abroad missing out on play, like a room full of people wanting fairness.
On the other hand, there is the broader context of the opponent’s mixed more culturally hard-wired exasperation with the aggressive tourists, stating, the methods you value and have fostered and nurtured as one way of separating yourself culturally from us, it’s just a joke after all.
And this is the real point. Everything is a cult. The approach was a phenomenon as the game has its own culture. Or rather, the team has long been exclusive, a circle, an elite gathering, a restricted environment with centuries of ceremonial past behind it. This has always been where influence is guarded. It’s the imperial sport of England, the early image-makers. And guess what, Britain is itself a cult, a system of unknown levels, a place that literally still has a king.
England’s cricketers have been isolated in this system since childhood. Attempting to break free, to build a better atmosphere, they are mirroring their own experience, forming a new circle, a limited community, but doing it this time with 15 cool guys and a mentor promoting authenticity if you fit the mold.
Live where your feet are. Embrace challenges. But no matter how fast and far you run, you remain stuck.
With this mind, it is perhaps the moment to have some sympathy for the movement, to recognize its positives, which are significant. What is Bazball? Promoting liberation. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with